Sunday, January 26, 2020

Leisure: From Ancient Greece To Today

Leisure: From Ancient Greece To Today Leisure, used as an all-inclusive term to describe the meaning, conditions, functions, and opportunity complex in which recreation / play occurs (Murphy, p. 22), and can thus be seen as a concept or study which only offers information about the way in which people spend their spare time, but is also actually far more intriguing and multifaceted. An interesting fact is that the term leisure is derived from the Latin word licere or to be permitted to abstain from occupation or service' (Murphy, p. 24), thus showing the roots of leisure; being free from the physical and forced activities like labour. In this paper I will attempt to examine what precisely leisure entails and how it can be linked to identity formation, as well as depicting the developments in leisure as a concept throughout history. In order to do so, I will touch upon three remarkable periods of the past; first of all Ancient Greece as the era of the great philosophers, then the period around 1900 in Western Europe, and finally I will research the significance of leisure in todays globalising world. Finally, to discuss the relationship between leisure and identity formation, I will incorporate the subsequent topics within each historical time frame; The concept and division/availability of leisure The relation between work and leisure The link between leisure and human development The social differences between individuals and groups of individuals After having discussed each time period in detail and having thus constructed a general timeline of leisure, I will round up with a conclusion hoping to have then found answers to the questions surrounding the notion of leisure. Ancient Greece Ancient Greece, which is generally considered as the period from the Archaic period of the 8th to 6th centuries BCE to 146 BCE and the Roman conquest of Greece after the Battle of Corinth (Amazines), can be seen as the era of the great philosophers who we still recognize today. Not only this is what makes Ancient Greece so fascinating, but this is also the period in which leisure as a concept emerged, with the cultivation of the self interpretation developed by Aristotle (384 B.C. 322 B.C.) (Murphy, p. 23). During these days, leisure was seen as an activity used to seek the truth, and the understanding of the self. Contemplation was key, and it was considered a notion of being free, and of not being occupied with work or other commitments. But which exact activities did leisure entail then? I believe that Anderson puts it properly, though from the Greco-Roman perspective; They learned music and played it and enjoyed the physical arts of war and sport. They were skilled in intellectu al conversation, and that consumed much time. But they rarely had an interest in talking about handwork and ordinary labour or even cared to understand its meaning. In their way of life there was no hurry (Anderson, p. 91). Thus, leisure was at the root of society and its culture, and paved the way for many great philosophers through intellectual discussions. But for leisure to exist in the way it did in Ancient Greece as the time free from commitments or work, a distinction had to be made between individuals. This distinction was mainly to allow certain people to engage in leisure, while others were forced to engage in the opposite of leisure; labour and hard work. Or as Murphy puts it; the aristocratic quality of the Ancient democracy gave the leisure class a tradition of taste and elegance which was maintained by the nobility (Murphy, p. 24), consequently leisure was made possible for the privileged because slavery existed. The privileged used slavery as a way to express power and control, maybe even only for the sake of being in control over others. But dominating and bossing others around, are among the first activities that humans, newly empowered, discovered and enjoyed for their own sakes (Hunnicutt, p. 60), showing that leisure not only existed off contemplation and conversation, but also of horrid activities creating a division between groups of people. Still, undoubtedly servants and women held in whatever degree of bondage, were able to understand the difference between the times in their lives when service was required of them, and other times when they were free to do more of what they wished (Hunnicutt, p. 60). So, although leisure is mainly seen as a privilege for the higher classes of men, also the women and slaves experienced leisure to some extent. This shows that the availability of leisure differed depending on your class of gender, but that most likely everybody experienced it to some extend in Ancient Greece. Therefore, leisure should be seen as key to human development. Not only did it pave the way for great philosophers and religious men, others also used it in connection to their identity as it is part of human nature. For the Greeks, leisure was used as a cultural arena in which vital questions of human means and ends, of purpose and hence of meaning, have been addressed (Hunnicutt, p. 58), and thus gave room to answer significant questions concerning life and human-beings since man is a symbolizing, conceptualizing, meaning-seeking animal (Geertz, p. 140). Leisure could be seen as a means to understand the meaning of life, and come to know and develop the self. Leisure thus led to identity and self-development through personal growth and freedom, since the sign of an educated person was active leisure (Hunnicutt, p. 64). Industrial Revolution After the Ancient Greece timeframe as previously discussed, the leisure tradition established by the Greeks continued through the Middle Ages. The Liberal Arts taught in the universities, the understanding of work and leisure as means to ends, endured (Hunnicutt, p. 67). And when the Industrial Revolution was ongoing in Europe, leisure was still present but significant changes were gradually taking place in its character and the influence it held in daily life. It could be said that a revolution in human history and leisure occurred when capitalism transformed the role of work, as one does not work to live, one lives to work (Pieper, p. 40). Then, work became a spiritual end in itself and was thought to answer the questions vis-Ã  -vis leisure. It also started to take on a submissive role as it was used as a way to achieve and support the highest purpose; work. Subsequently, work emerged out of the nineteenth century both as the basis of modern culture and as the glue that held soci eties together (Hunnicutt, p. 69), and basically took over the role leisure held in Ancient times. But even though work was key, the concept of spare time, and thus leisure, changed over time after the Industrial Revolution had left its mark. For example, farmers and factory-workers worked six ten-hours days from sunrise to sunset, and it was not until the sixty-hour work week of 1900 shrank to thirty-nine hours by 1975 (Rosenthal, p. 11), that people possessed more free time to spend on leisure activities of ones own choice. Even though they still had to work hard the work ethic gradually changed, people now possessed a day, and later even two, during which they were free to choose what to do. It was no longer the master who possessed free time and told his slaves what to do, the whole day, every day. More money was now being made, and thus being spend during those few hours or days the workers had off and activities related to sport, education, self-development, and entertainment started to rise. Also, the availability of more and cheaper goods due to the revolution led to an in crease in the standard of living, and thus formation of identity. People were slightly and slowly more able to establish themselves as different from others, and to use goods to identify with. Finally, it was only in the nineteenth century that the real impact of steam would be fully felt (Robinson, B). Steam changed the availability of opportunities, as well as leisure. Work was performed faster and more efficient, and changes also happened geographically as factories could now be located anywhere, as well as the workers. Transportation increased due to the invention of railways, and thus leisure opportunities surfaced since people could travel further and were no longer limited to the area they worked and lived in; horizons slowly widened. The Ancient Greeks were able to see leisure as their work, but the workers from the Industrial Revolution could only participate in leisure and non-work behaviour after their long days of labour. Not only the content and value of leisure changed, but also the impact it had on the individual. Since the Industrial Revolution, Americans have inherited a sociopsychological attitude which equates individual self-worth and productivity with working (Murphy, p. 27), thus showing the influence work had on life and ones goals. The Revolution created further interest in the individual in society and the responsibilities of society to them, together with the realization that the ultimate power within society is in the hands of those that are governed rather than the governing classes (Ouedraogo, D). The working class, and thereby the individual and his interests became more important, and people had more choices related to identity formation as mentioned before. Todays globalizing world The changes that took place in leisure in Ancient Greece and around the 1900s show its roots, but also the rudiments that have made leisure to be what it is today. Today, the twenty-first century, leisure still takes up an important place in many aspects of peoples lives and is still seen as time free from work-related responsibilities (Murphy, p. 27), as well as obligatory household tasks. More and more activities are now acceptable forms of leisure, and more money and time is dedicated to them. Also, due to globalization much more is possible, since the world is brought closer to our home. We now have internet, television, mass media and facilitation of travelling; anything is possible. Too see what function leisure holds in todays society in relation to identity and development, I will look at it from the following perspectives; behavioural, psychological and social. Behaviour in leisure should be recognized as an expression of the individuals total self; cognitive, affective, and motor domains are potentially engaged (Murphy, p. 29). Thus, engaging in leisure is key to personal development since it touches upon many important aspects of the individual. Also, since behaviour is goal-directed, leisure can also be seen as as direct result of goal-seeking (Murphy, p. 29), and success or failure in such activities will strongly influence ones mental and physical state, as well as future participation. Also, according to the French sociologist Joffre Dumazedier, leisure fulfils three functions: relaxation, entertainment, and personal development (Murphy, p. 30), again showing that leisure is key to self-development through exercising ones capacities. From the second and psychological perspective, leisure is also important for self-improvement, as to leisure means to be oneself, to express ones talents, ones capacities, ones potentials (Murphy, p. 30), as stated by Neulinger. Leisure is a state of mind and being, since it is then that one is free to choose what to do and engage in what brings satisfaction, fulfilment and pleasure. Thus, from the psychological perspective, it would tend to analyze leisure activities according to the needs they satisfy (Murphy, p. 31), which can only be fulfilled during free time and not through achievement in work like during the Industrial Revolution was the case. Examples are needs for sex, independence, understanding, getting along with others (Murphy, p. 32). The third perspective is that the social function of leisure, as the most significant determinant of what one does in leisure is membership in a social group. Leisure is a means for establishing and sustaining intragroup solidarity (Murphy, p. 32). Friendship and kinship are crucial determents here, and belonging to a social circle with common interests is what individuals aim at through leisure. This can be seen when people participate in sports, theatre, crafts, or other clubs organized to bring those together who are alike. This can also be through identifying with others with similar education, occupation, race, or income; some of the socioeconomic-demographic indicators. What also plays an important role in leisure, is the newfound presence of choice in this globalizing world. So much is present and available when it comes to activities, resources, knowledge and goods that choice greatly penetrates our culture; it has transformed not only how we live but also how we think and who we are (Rosenthal, p. 1), through the presence of excessive choice. We no longer have to give something up in order to gain something else, we can now sometimes have our cake and eat it too (Rosenthal, p. 9) and now sacrifice les which made our wants become needs. We have embraced change, and the necessity to travel down all of lifes branches is real to us (Rosenthal, p. 9). Since we have excessive choice, our leisure has become so broad and open to our own preferences that we can maximize our own potentials through it. Also, since one hours work buys six times as much now as it did in 1900 (Rosenthal, p. 12) we can spend much more on leisure, and thus again have to choose l ess and have more. Today, we also develop ourselves through serious leisure, which is the degree of seriousness tied to an activity as the activity involvement of these devotes shows a degree of intensity that is consistent with flow experience and a patterns of commitment that joins them with others in a unique ethos of shared meaning and perseverance (Kleiber, p. 25). Leisure activities of this level can seem to work in some extent, but are free of choice and are therefore sources of self-esteem, self-actualization, and other psychological and social benefits (Kleiber, p. 25), showing the great link between serious leisure and development. Also, since leisure in todays globalizing world is less linked to gender and race and more and more available to everybody, it can be seen as a true sources for self-development and identity formation. Identity formation then takes place not only through serious leisure, but also through more general and simplified versions of leisure. For example, athletics perform sports as their work. For most, engaging in sport is a form of leisure that brings pleasure and self-improvement, but for a true sportsman this is his identity. He is a footballer, he is a rugby player, he is a dancer. Wherever he will go, this part of him will be at the roots of his other actions since he is so serious about it and cannot afford letting other types of leisure take away from what he has achieved; their identification and commitment is evident in joining groups and sacrificing other aspects of life (Kleiber, p. 25). This is the same for musicians, many band members identify with their job and consider the musician label to be indistinguishable from their identity. Conclusion Leisure can thus truly be seen as a source of self-development and identity formation. Even though leisure has gradually changed throughout the years and has even shown distinct characteristics during when comparing the timeframes, the core has remained the same; free time dedicated activities of ones own choice used to better the self. To conclude, most noteworthy is the part leisure took up in an individuals life. In Ancient Greece, leisure mainly served as an activity that took up the entire day for the elite, whereas for the slaves it consisted of the little time free from the orders of the master. It was mainly used to engage in intellectual conversations, and plain activities like sports. During the Industrial Revolution this outlook changed, and work became most important and took over the role leisure used to hold in the lives of the elite; self-improvement was achieved through work and not leisure. However, this was also the period when the workers started to protest and managed to receive a better work-week with more free time in the weekend; time free to be dedicated to leisure since money was also more available. Finally, in todays society leisure takes up an maybe even more important role and is still the time dedicated to activities free of choice used to develop the self. Thus, leisure has always play ed an important role and its nature has remained constant, while its use and availability has changed.

Friday, January 17, 2020

First meeting Issues

In the first meeting of the Land Committee held on 22nd December, 2004 it was decided to hold public hearings with recognized political parties, civil society organizations and peoples? unions working on land issues of the poor to understand the various issues on land reforms. The Committee held public hearings in Hydrated, Wrangle, Vigilant and Atrophic. The visits to the districts and public meetings were followed by field visits to districts and villages to get a firsthand knowledge of the land issues affecting the poor.In an overwhelming response, political parties and civil society organizations attended all the public hearings and cutting across party lines, have demanded that land issues affecting the poor required immediate attention by the Government. Commissioning of Studies In order to understand the land issues in greater detail and also the relevance and use of the existing Revenue Acts, the committee has commissioned studies on various aspects of land issues by speciali sts and experts.Studies have been conducted on Board Standing Orders and Revenue Acts, Tribal land issues, issues of Tenancy, the phenomenon of absentee landlord's and that of plain paper transactions (Sad bambina transactions), functioning of the legal system and state of the endowment lands (Terms of References of the studies and consultants/consulting organizations conducting the study enclosed).Recommendations immediately operational in nature While commissioning the studies the Land Committee was very clear that recommendations evolving from the studies would not be theoretical in nature and focus shall be on operational issues. The Committee has tried its best to cover the important and pressing land issues. The recommendations of the committee while not exhaustive nevertheless cover substantial ground. Page 3 of 101 Land still the single most emotive issue in rural areas It has been the Committee?s experience that the issue of land continues to be the single most emotive issu e in the rural areas.

Thursday, January 9, 2020

M v Home Office - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1416 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Case study Did you like this example? Briefly explain the case of M v Home Office (1994) as it relates to the concept of the Rule of Law Dicey proposed that every man is subject to the ordinary law of the realm and amenable to the jurisdiction of the ordinary tribunals, whatever his à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"rank or conditionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢[1]. The accuracy of this assertion came under challenge in the case of M v Home Office (1994)[2], in which two issues of constitutional importance were considered; firstly whether injunctions could be issued against a government minister or department, and secondly whether a government minister or department could be found to be in contempt of court for failing to comply with a court order[3]. The case concerned à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, a citizen of Zaire who sought political asylum under the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees[4]. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "M v Home Office" essay for you Create order Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s application was rejected by the Home Office who ordered his removal from the UK. The Court of Appeal refused an application for leave to move for judicial review and so a fresh application was made, which alleged new grounds, to Garland J in chambers. Garland J indicated that Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s departure should be postponed in order to consider the application, and his understanding was that the Home Office had given an undertaking that this would be done. In fact, the undertaking given was that they would à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"endeavourà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ to postpone the departure; and regardless of à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"endeavoursà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, M was removed from jurisdiction on a flight to Zaire via Paris. On hearing of this, Garland J made a à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"without noticeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ mandatory order, noting that the apparent à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"undertakingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ had been breached and requiring the Home Secretary to procure Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s return; and so arrangements were made for this[5]. The order granted the Secretary of State liberty to vary or discharge it, and so following advice from his officials, the Home Secretary cancelled the arrangements for Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s return, concluding that the underlying decision to refuse asylum had been correct, and that the order made by Garland J was made without jurisdiction. Proceedings were brought against the Home Secretary on behalf of M (who had since disappeared following his arrival in Zaire) and a finding was made that Kenneth Baker, when acting as Home Secretary, had been guilty of contempt of court with the result simply that Mr Baker should pay costs[6]. One of the significant considerations in the case was whether the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 granted immunity to the Crown and its servants from injunctions when acting in their official capacity[7]. Up until 1947, the Crown enjoyed a number of substantial immunities and benefited from various procedural advantages in litigation[8]. Under the Act, however, the Crown is subject to the same liabilities in tort as a person of full age and capacity[9]; it is further vicariously liable for torts committed by its servants or agents[10]. The extent to which the Crown is liable appears to be limited by the Act. The 1994 case established, however, that the Act does not preclude the grant of an injunction against a particular crown servant, and such a view was in keeping with the history of prerogative proceedings against officers of the Crown. Although the Crown cannot be subject to this remedy, its servants carrying out its tasks will be[11]. Lord Templeman in delivering his brief judgement noted that the argument that there was no power to enforce the law by injunction or contempt proceedings against a minister in his official capacity would, if upheld, establish the proposition that the executive obey the law as a matter of grace and not as a matter of necessity, a proposition which his Lordship said would reverse the result of the Civil War[12]. Lord Woolf, delivering the main opinion of the Court, affirmed the finding of the Court of Appeal à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“save for substitution of designation Secretary of State for Home Affairs as proper object of finding of contemptà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ [13]. It was held that Garland J had jurisdiction to grant the order per Note 53/1-14/24 to the Supreme Court Practice 1993 which permits such a grant in urgent cases; further, the order was made by the High Court and so valid until set aside[14]. Whilst it might be acceptable to delay complying with the order until an application has been made for further guidance from the Court, the person in whose favour the order has been made (in this case M) must not be disadvantaged pending the hearing. In this case, the cancellation of plans to return M to the safety of the UK comprised a failure to protect his position and thus a disadvantage. Lord Woolf further examined the issue of whether a finding of contempt could be made against the Crown, government department or minister of the Crown. He considered that the Crown did have legal personality[15] so this did not present a hindrance to such a finding. Further, whilst acknowledging the argument that contempt proceedings were usually personal and punitive (and would therefore be inappropriate against the Crown or an officer of a Crown) he did not accept that this was always their function, and held that a finding of contempt could vindicate the requirements of justice. The issue as to whether the courts have jurisdiction to issue à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"coerciveà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ orders against the Crown or ministers of the Crown was said to go to the heart of à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“the relationship between the executive and the courtsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ [16]. Such sanctions are necessarily within a courtà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s jurisdiction to protect orders it has made, although they should only be issued in the most limited circumstances as they w ill usually be unnecessary[17],[18]. Their existence however reflects Diceyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s ideal that officials and others should have no exemption from the duty of the law that governs other citizens, or from the jurisdiction of ordinary tribunals[19], in order that citizens may enjoy legal protection against unlawful conduct on the part of officials[20]. However great the powers or duties conferred on the executive, it is necessary in a parliamentary democracy[21] that all concerned are equally responsible before the ordinary courts for the exercise of their rights, powers and duties[22]. Word count: 1,000 + refs bibliography AV Dicey An Introduction to the Study of the Law of Constitution (10th Edition Macmillan London 1965) M Allen B Thompson Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (7th Edition Oxford University Press London 2002) Halsburys Laws of England Administrative Law (Volume 1(1) 2001 Reissue) 4. Judicial Control (4) Judicial Remedi es (iii) Mandatory Orders b. Public Offices and Duties in Respect of Which a Mandatory Order Will Not Lie 148. Mandatory Orders Against the Crown and Crown Servants Halsburys Laws of England Administrative Law (Volume 1(1) 2001 Reissue) 4. Judicial Control (4) Judicial Remedies (iv) Declarations and Injunctions b. injunctions 152. The injunction in public law. RVF Heuston The Rule of Law in Essays in Constitutional Law (2nd Edition 1964) 44-48 LexisNexis UK : https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal Table of Cases Francome and Another v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd and Others (1984) 2 All ER 408 at 412 Isaacs v Robertson (1985) Ac 97 M v Home Office (1994) 1 A.C. 377 R v Secretary of State for War [1891] 2 QB 326, CA R v Treasury Lords Comrs (1872) LR 7 QB 387 at 402 Re A Company (1981) AC 374 Town Investment Ltd v Department of the Environment (1978) Ac 359 Footnotes [1] AV Dicey An Introduction to the Study of the Law of Constitution (10th Edition Macmillan London 1959) 193 as quoted in M Allen B Thompson Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (7th Edition Oxford University Press London 2002) 216 [2] 1 A.C. 377 [3] Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (n 1 above) 217 [4] (1951) (Cmd. 9171): (1994) 1 A.C. 377 at 398 [5] [1994] 1 A.C. 377 at 400 [6] (1994) 1 A.C. 377 at 397-403 [7] Section 21(1) [8] RC Clements J Kay Constitutional and Administrative Law (3rd Edition Oxford University Press Oxford)179 [9] Section 2 (amended by the Statute Law Repeals Act 1981 [10] As defined by Section 6 [11] Constitutional and Administrative Law (n 8 above) 182 [12] [1994] 1 A.C. 377 at 396 [13] [1994] 1 A.C. 377 at 428 [14] In Re A Company (1981) AC 374, 384 and Isaacs v Robertson (1985) Ac 97, 102 per Lord Diplock [15] As sole corporation or corporation aggregate per Lor d Diplock in Town Investment Ltd v Department of the Environment (1978) Ac 359 [16] [1994] 1 A.C. 377 at 406 [17] Halsburys Laws of England Administrative Law (Volume 1(1) 2001 Reissue) 152. The Injunction in Public Law [18] (1994) 1 A.C. 377 per Lord Woolf; cf R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p Factortame [1990] 2 AC 85, [1989] 2 All ER 692, HL [19] An Introduction to the Study of the Law of Constitution (n1 above) 202-203 [20] Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (n 1 above) 215 [21] Per Lord Donaldson MR in Francome and Another v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd and Others (1984) 2 All ER 408 at 412 [22] RVF Heuston The Rule of Law in Essays in Constitutional Law (2nd Edition 1964) 44-48 in Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (n 1 above) 215

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Cyber Security Role For Homeland Security Intelligence

The intelligence community itself has made a major shift of how it operates, what are its priorities and its ability to protect the nation in the entry of the 21st century. The attacks on 9/11 greatly changed the way we see the world now and has shown major flaws within the intelligence community. Those events led the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and with it pooled federal agencies into in umbrella for it to be centralized in order to be effective. There are three categories in which the Homeland Security Intelligence face in the 21st century. Those categories are technological, political, and cyber security. In this day in age everything from critical infrastructure, government information to money is being digitalized to the internet. Furthermore, it gave a showed a new front in which our nation can be attacked via cyber space. The Cyber security role for Homeland Security intelligence has become increasingly worrisome. Due to the fact that the cyber security of the nation has become increasingly targeted by foreign organizations, countries, and terrorists. One of the most potentially damaging targets is the nation’s critical infrastructure, especially the water and energy. In an article Hacking Gets Physical, it states that the â€Å"FBI confirmed that operatives in Russia, Iran, and China conducted mapping operations in order to discover weakness in the nations cyber security.† The critical infrastructure is becoming more digitalized because of itsShow MoreRelatedHomeland Security And Homeland Defense1390 Words   |  6 Pages Many people think homeland security and homeland defense are the same thing, but that is incorrect. Both have played a role in keeping America safe, but after 9/11 that role expanded greatly. The U.S. was determined to prevent another catastrophic attack from unfolding while searching the globe for those responsible. In a world constantly evolving, our enemies and their tactics evolve with it. To effectively combat the incredible amount of threats America faces, many federal entities and missionRead MoreThe Homeland Security And Homeland Defense Missions923 Words   |  4 Pages Introduction The homeland security and homeland defense missions were developed in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. Designed to fill gaps in intelligence sharing to defend against or response to terror attacks. This paper will discuss the future success of the current homeland security and homeland defense missions. It will also look into the role civil liberties plays in that success. Discussion The missions held by homeland security and homeland defense are vital to the protectionRead MoreIntelligence And The Homeland Security1205 Words   |  5 PagesWhat are the capabilities and limitations of intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts? While the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is one, centralized agency, securing the homeland involves the cooperation and collaboration of many, different agencies and organizations ranging from local law enforcement to national agencies such as the NSA, CIA, and FBI. Each of these agencies contributes to the development of homeland security intelligence. By carefully analyzing and commenting onRead MoreThe Differences Between Homeland Security And Homeland Defense1432 Words   |  6 Pagesdiscussing the difference between Homeland Security and Homeland Defense. I will be discussing the different roles that each department handles, which include each departments missions, tasks, duties, responsibilities, operations and other various issues that separate the two. I will also address the responsibilities of both homeland security and Homeland Defense that are shared between the two. Then I will use this information to provide my own description of Homeland Security. In the second half of thisRead MoreRole Of The Department Of Homeland Security1659 Words   |  7 PagesRole of the DHS in Counterterrorism On September 11, 2011, the United States observed the tenth anniversary of the worst terrorist attacks in the history of the United States . The creation of many anti-terrorism organizations was a clear message that this threat is beyond a single military or intelligence capacity. Our citizens demanded a strong response that would prevent any future terrorist threat. President Bush created the Department of Homeland Security as the key agency responsible forRead MoreThe Department Of Homeland Security1176 Words   |  5 Pagescurrent intelligence to forecast future threats. The DHS has identified areas in need of improvement in order to prepare for future threats. Citizens criticize policies in national security as infringing on civil liberties, and an ongoing debate ensues over the sacrifice of civil liberties in the name of national security. The DHS continues to evolve in analyzing future threats and identifying means for the organization to meet them. The DHS’s overall mission is to, â€Å"†¦ensure a homeland that isRead MoreIntelligence Sharing And The Capabilities Of The Homeland Security Enterprise Essay1670 Words   |  7 PagesIntelligence Sharing and the Capability of the Homeland Security Enterprise What are the capabilities and limitations of intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts? Since the deadly terror attacks of 9/11, intelligence gathering for homeland security has improved immensely. One of the most important developments in our law-enforcement structure that has enhanced our intelligence is the creation of fusion centers. Fusion centers are â€Å"state and major urban area focal points for the receiptRead MoreThe Threat Of Homeland Security1035 Words   |  5 PagesHomeland Security was created to protect not only the persons living and infrastructures within the U.S. but outside as well. Though its existence, homeland security has done a spectacular job due to the fact that the country is still standing. There are many persons and countries that would love to see America fall flat on its face. Through corrective policy action and growth within our intelligence functions we are now as strong as we were before. Nonetheless, Homeland security may still have itsRead MoreDepartment Of Homeland Security : Is America Safer?1329 Words   |  6 PagesDepartme nt of Homeland Security: Is America Safer? Introduction The congress’s oversight of the homeland security has been under constant criticism for failing to achieve its goals. Critics of this system state that this arrangement is overbearing and disjointed thus reducing its efficiency. Often times, there is wastage of resources, conflicting decisions, and ineffective oversight owing to the vast committees and congressional members that are mandated to control homeland security (Reese). To makeRead MoreThe Latest Terror Threat: Targeting the Elements of the US Information Infrastructure981 Words   |  4 Pagesinstitutions may simply be a natural response to the reduced capabilities of al-Qaeda and other terrorist networks, as confirmed by the leading authority on terrorism and its effects, and national security analyst for the CNN network, Peter Bergen, who observed recently that the Obama administration has played a large role in reducing terrorist threats by continuing and scaling up many of former President George W. Bushs counte r-terrorist methods (Bennetch 1). Despite the substantial progress made in